| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Multiply was ignoring the zero column, which was odd. I fixed this
other places but apparently missed multiply.
|
|
They still don't handle mixed scale comparisons correctly, it shouldn't
be too hard to add, but yeah...not supported yet.
|
|
If the array was zero elements long and then append was used it wouldn't
allocate memory, but it would try to write to a pointer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
It doesn't round yet, and there's a chance I should be increasing the
precision, right now it keeps the precision of the left hand side
number.
|
|
It's funny, I haven't extended division past the ones place yet, but it
does work correctly, so in theory it won't be too hard to do. I may
need a little bit of extra code in the PackedIntArray class to insert a
new digit at the begining.
|
|
It doesn't work by any means, and I think I confused myself partway
through. I shouldn't code when I'm that tired, at least not on
something this complex.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
iOrd is now iScale (places to the right of the decimal. And iOrder is
now iIdx, since it was just an index.
|
|
I'm a little embarassed that I didn't do this from the start, made the
code so much easier to read.
|
|
It computes the radix and bitwidth dynamically, we could probably speed
that up another step by simply having a table of common ones, but for
now it'll work for anything.
|
|
|
|
Division now works just fine, but by long division. There are
apparently much faster ways of doing division, but as long as it works I
feel like that's a great start :)
|
|
Still working on division, needed some other operators to make it work.
|
|
Division isn't working yet, there are too many options, I'll figure out
something eventually :-P
|
