Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | |
---|---|---|---|
2016-12-01 | The parser works. | Mike Buland | |
There's still more to do, however. It doesn't do math anymore, it produces a script that can then be executed. Now we have to capture that script and execute it. | |||
2016-12-01 | New layout for the parser, it doesn't parse yet. | Mike Buland | |
2016-11-30 | I managed to confuse myself pretty well. | Mike Buland | |
I'm doing some reading up on LR(n) parsers, I just sort of started without thinking about it this time, not a great approach. I feel like it can't hurt to have an update on how this works anyway. I think the idea was solid, but I was trying to do too much at once. One question is what my goal should be for this. I could just solve the equation as we go, or I could generate code that will let us solve the equation. The later is obviously attractive in that it will let us run an expression more than once, and maybe even define functions. I like that. | |||
2016-11-30 | Working on the parser, some issues. | Mike Buland | |
2013-05-08 | Command parameters are taken as strings & decimal.0.06 | Mike Buland | |
You no longer need to set the radix in the current radix. | |||
2013-04-23 | Now supports modulus (strange for fractions). | Mike Buland | |
2013-04-23 | Variables work. | Mike Buland | |
2013-04-22 | There is now a parser & calculator interface. | Mike Buland | |