As evidenced by my latest test, the Bu::FString copy is actually slower than

the std::string copy by a rather large margin.  This seems very odd, so I'm
going to do a few tests, the first one is stripping out the FString shared
pointer stuff and seeing if that makes an appreciable difference.

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 48 deletions

diff --git a/src/old/tests/fstring.cpp b/src/old/tests/fstring.cpp
deleted file mode 100644
index 271738c..0000000
--- a/src/old/tests/fstring.cpp
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,48 +0,0 @@
-#include "hash.h"
-#include "fstring.h"
-
-FString genThing()
-{
-        FString bob;
-        bob.append("ab ");
-        bob += "cd ";
-        bob += "efg";
-
-    printf("---bob------\n%08X: %s\n", (unsigned int)bob.c_str(), bob.c_str() );
-        return bob;
-}
-
-void thing( FString str )
-{
-        printf("Hey:  %s\n", str.c_str() );
-}
-
-#define pem printf("---------\n%08X: %s\n%08X: %s\n", (unsigned int)str.c_str(), str.c_str(), (unsigned int)str2.c_str(), str2.c_str() );
-int main( int argc, char *argv )
-{
-        FString str("th");
-
-        str.prepend("Hello ");
-        str.append("ere.");
-
-        FString str2( str );
-        pem;
-        str += "  What's up?";
-        pem;
-        str2 += "  How are you?";
-        pem;
-        str = str2;
-        pem;
-
-        str2 = genThing();
-        pem;
-
-        str = str2;
-        pem;
-
-        thing( str2 );
-        thing("test.");
-        
-        printf("%d == %d\n", __calcHashCode( str ), __calcHashCode( str.c_str() ) );
-}
-