aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/hash.cpp (follow)
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2011-01-20Wow, got the Stream changes propegated, all tests build with string instead ofMike Buland
fstring, and updated the copyright notice to extend to 2011
2010-02-13Added and updated the license info in all the source files, they still saidMike Buland
copyright 2007-2008.
2010-01-07A bunch of things weren't including their own files in quite the correct way...Mike Buland
2009-11-12I've started my campaign to clean up all of the header files in libbu++ as farMike Buland
as includes go. This required a little bit of reworking as far as archive goes, but I've been planning on changing it aronud for a bit anyway. The final result here is that you may need to add some more includes in your own code, libbu++ doesn't include as many random things you didn't ask for anymore, most of these seem to be bu/hash.h, unistd.h, and time.h. Also, any Archive functions and operators should use ArchiveBase when they can instead of Archive, archivebase.h is a much lighterweight include that will be used everywhere in core that it can be, there are a few classes that actually want a specific archiver to be used, they will use it (such as the nids storage class). So far, except for adding header files, nothing has changed in functionality, and no other code changes should be required, although the above mentioned archive changeover is reccomended.
2008-02-07Just updated the copyright date.Mike Buland
2007-11-15Added liscense info at the front of many, many files. Debating the old files.Mike Buland
2007-10-14Fixed an interesting ideosyncacy in Bu::Hash in a safe way, I should try to doMike Buland
this with the Bu::Archive next. Basically, there's one generic template function that will convert anything that can safely cast to a uint32_t and that supports direct comparisson, and doesn't have it's own override already to be a Hash key, such as char, uint8_t, uint64_t, etc. The Telnet protocol handler does everything I need it too for now, next up for it is escape sequence handling, it would be nice to make this general too, by using the termcap database or something, but there is an ANSI/ISO standard now, I may just go ahead and use that. Also, it looks like it'd be pretty easy to make the canonical mode editing functions be pluggable to facilitate different types of editing, but that can be done down the road as well.
2007-04-03The first batch seem to have made it alright. Unfortunately the Archive classMike Buland
isn't done yet, I'm going to make it rely on streams, so those will be next, then we can make it work all sortsa' well.
2007-04-03Ok, no code is left in src, it's all in src/old. We'll gradually move code backMike Buland
into src as it's fixed and re-org'd. This includes tests, which, I may write a unit test system into libbu++ just to make my life easier.
2007-03-21Fixed another random bug in the string compare for raw strings.Mike Buland
2007-03-15This version may break hashing of strings, but at least you can hash FStrings...Mike Buland
templates are confusing.
2007-01-17Added more hash functions, yay hash functions!Mike Buland
2006-11-22Yup, slightly more optimized, still works.Mike Buland
2006-11-22Fixed a silly mistake that made the whole thing useless when using strings.Mike Buland
2006-11-21Hash uses real exceptions now, and has a clear() function.Mike Buland
2006-11-21Added erase functionality, and specializations for using ints as hash keys, soMike Buland
really it does everything the old one did, does it better, easier, and possibly faster.
2006-11-21Wow, craziness. Part way through working on the confpair system I got someMike Buland
sudden insperation and completely redid Hash. Now everything but delete is implemented, including typesafe iterators and more. It's really cool, and everyone should check it out and start using it right away!
2006-07-26Added the not-yet-working hash class. More thought must be done. This doesn'tMike Buland
actually change any existing code really just adds a new class that you can't use because it's commented out. I'll probably move it to a branch.