libbu++.git - System level, general purpose C++ library.

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author
2007-03-15	This version may break hashing of strings, but at least you can hash FStrings...	Mike Buland
	templates are confusing.
2007-03-02	Removed debugging from the Hash	Mike Buland

2007-01-29	Added another new helper to Hash.	Mike Buland

2007-01-27	New feature in Hash, a copy constructor, you can now put a hash into other	Mike Buland
	templatized containers.
2007-01-19	Experimental commit to see if references work...	Mike Buland

2007-01-17	Added more hash functions, yay hash functions!	Mike Buland

2006-11-27	Added the new OrdHash, check the test file for an example.	Mike Buland

2006-11-24	Fixed size bug.	Mike Buland

2006-11-24	david - added size	David

2006-11-21	Nooow everything in the lib is clean with -Wall, hash was a template and didn't	Mike Buland
	complain until I ran the tests. The tests will be fixed next.
2006-11-21	Hash uses real exceptions now, and has a clear() function.	Mike Buland

2006-11-21	Added a has function to Hash	Mike Buland

2006-11-21	Updated a thing.	Mike Buland

2006-11-21	Added erase functionality, and specializations for using ints as hash keys, so	Mike Buland
	really it does everything the old one did, does it better, easier, and possibly faster.
2006-11-21	OK, everything that did work works, but now the HashProxy is as fast as insert,	Mike Buland
	and has more options. Use [] all you want!
2006-11-21	Many good updates, but I'm gonna' switch computers, it'll build again in a sec.	Mike Buland

2006-11-21	Wow, craziness. Part way through working on the confpair system I got some	Mike Buland
	sudden insperation and completely redid Hash. Now everything but delete is implemented, including typesafe iterators and more. It's really cool, and everyone should check it out and start using it right away!
2006-07-26	Added the not-yet-working hash class. More thought must be done. This doesn't	Mike Buland
	actually change any existing code really just adds a new class that you can't use because it's commented out. I'll probably move it to a branch.