Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
command line parameters now, I would like to also add an automatic paramter that
would switch it to a computer-readable output mode for use in a larger testing
framework.
|
|
way, way, way more problems than it solved. A number of libbu++ tests were
inacurate because of it, there were problems in several other programs, and
there may be more that have problems we haven't found yet because of this.
This will most likely cause complitaion errors, especially in places we didn't
expect, where strings were being stored into or passed as integers and the like.
In cases where you were just testing a string, just call the "isSet()" function,
which is functionally equivellent to the old bool cast operator.
|
|
copyright 2007-2008.
|
|
|
|
less code, and it does everything with more style and panache, also fewer bugs.
|
|
char, etc.) and OptParser totally works. I have one last change to make to it,
which is using the return value of signal type options to determine weather or
not the option took a parameter at all, especially in the case of short options.
|
|
it's done. It works great, and provides much flexibility and usefulness.
It now relies on the input side of the Formatter class, which at the moment
supports reading strings...not real useful yet...
Next up, adding readers for numbers and such, then it'll be mostly complete.
Also, fixed a bug when copying uninitialized signal objects.
|
|
Now I just have to come up with a way to modify data that you already have,
that sure was a nice feature of the old one, even if it was implemented in a
silly way.
|
|
now, I'll probably add more later on...
I've also started on the replacement for ParamProc, OptParser. It should do
everything that ParamProc did, only with less code, and much better.
|