Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Like, seriously, they're almost completely different.
|
|
|
|
|
|
It may not have had as much to do with low-level protocol details, and a
lot of this can be reverted, but I can't revert it right now. I'll look
it over later in the week.
|
|
and both really need to be. Bu::Client is used in multi-threaded applications
and has been for a while, so it's a no brainer. It may need a little bit more
safety added around variable access, but all the buffers are safe now.
ProtocolTelnet has it's own issus, and I should probably rework a few parts of
it before too long so we can better accomidate things like line editing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
little explenation of the arrangement.
|